Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073557›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Temporal recurrence as a general mechanism to explain neural responses in the auditory system.

Ulysse Rançon, Timothée Masquelier, Benoit R Cottereau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulysse RançonUniv Toulouse, CNRS, CerCo, Toulouse, France. ulysse.rancon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3149-4870
Timothée Masquelier *Univ Toulouse, CNRS, CerCo, Toulouse, France.
Benoit R Cottereau *Univ Toulouse, CNRS, CerCo, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-7680

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-21-CE28-0021Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR PRC ReViS-MD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models of neural processing in the auditory cortex usually ignore that neurons have an internal memory: they characterize their responses from simple convolutions with a finite temporal window. To circumvent this limitation, we propose here a new, simple and fully recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture incorporating cutting-edge computational blocks from the deep learning community and constituting the first attempt to model auditory responses with deep RNNs. We evaluated the ability of this approach to fit neural responses from 8 publicly available datasets, spanning 3 animal species and 6 auditory brain areas, representing the largest compilation of this kind. Our recurrent models significantly outperform previous methods and a new Transformer-based architecture of our design on this task, suggesting that temporal recurrence is the key to explain auditory responses. Finally, we developed a novel interpretation technique to reverse-engineer any pretrained model, regardless of its stateful or stateless nature. Largely inspired by works from explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) -a field focused on enhancing the interpretability and transparency of complex machine learning models-, our method suggests that auditory neurons have longer memory (several seconds) than indicated by current techniques based on the Spectro-Temporal Receptive Field (STRF). Together, these results highly motivate the use of deep RNNs within computational models of sensory neurons, as protean building blocks capable of assuming any function.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PerceptionModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAnimals

Identifiers

PMID41073557
PMCPMC12514165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.