Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073499›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Affective homophily as the dominant organizing principle in online conflict discourse networks.

Zhexi Gu, Runping Zhu, Fushi Bian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhexi GuSchool of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. zhexigu@unc.edu.
Runping ZhuSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.
Fushi BianDepartment of Digital Media and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

CCMCR Research Fund UICR0400014-24UIC Start-up Research Fund UICR0700111-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study develops a diagnostic framework using a Graph Attention Network (GATv2) to uncover the organizing principles of online conflict networks. By modeling link prediction and rigorously comparing GATv2 against multiple baselines, we validate its superior performance and interpretability. Our analysis delivers a "computational verdict": the model learns to overwhelmingly prioritize affective homophily while systematically discounting users' structural prestige. Probing the learned embeddings reveals that emotion is the dominant dimension of this homophily, a phenomenon we term "emotional fortresses." Critically, by analyzing the model's prediction failures, we identify a novel class of "emergent brokers" who bridge emotional divides through low centrality and affective neutrality. Finally, applying the framework to non-conflict domains empirically establishes the theory's boundary conditions. This research provides a new theoretical lens and methodological tool for understanding network dynamics in polarized environments.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalEmotionsHumansModels, TheoreticalSocial NetworkingAffective homophilyComputational social scienceGraph attention networkNetwork brokeragePolarization

Identifiers

PMID41073499
PMCPMC12514174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.