Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073498›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessing proxy and AI models performance in waterflooding optimization.

Yaser Abdollahfard, Jalal Fahimpour, Mohammad Ahmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaser AbdollahfardPetroleum Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Jalal FahimpourInstitute of GeoEnergy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland. J.Fahimpour_1@hw.ac.uk.
Mohammad AhmadiPetroleum Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water flooding remains one of the most widely used improved oil recovery (IOR) methods, even after decades of hydrocarbon production and the application of various IOR techniques. However, real reservoir simulations are computationally expensive and time-consuming due to the complexity of reservoir models. To address this, researchers increasingly rely on artificial intelligence and neural network-based proxy models as faster alternatives. While proxy models reduce computational effort, their ability to predict reservoir behavior remains a challenge reliably. This study evaluates the reliability of proxy models in optimization tasks. The Punq-S3 benchmark reservoir model was used to optimize well control parameters and maximize net present value (NPV) through two approaches: one based on proxy models and the other on full-physics reservoir simulation. Four deep learning algorithms (ANN, LSTM, GRU, and EL) were combined with two design of experiment techniques (Taguchi and Latin hypercube sampling) to generate eight proxy models. The particle swarm optimization and Bayesian optimization algorithms were selected to optimize the injection and production strategy for the two approaches. after optimization and comparison of the results, it was observed that despite the constructed proxy models exhibited acceptable predictive performance in terms of statistical metrics (e.g., RMSE, R²), the optimization results they yielded significantly deviated from those based on the full-physics reservoir model. This reveals a critical trade-off between computational efficiency and decision-making reliability. While proxy models offer a cost-effective alternative for rapid predictions, caution is needed when applying them to optimization tasks, where minor prediction errors can lead to substantially different outcomes. This study highlights the importance of evaluating proxy models not only based on accuracy metrics but also on their ability to capture optimization-relevant dynamics.

Indexed as

And particle swarm optimizationDeep learningNet present valueProxy modelsWater flooding optimization

Identifiers

PMID41073498
PMCPMC12514260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.