ArticleScientific reports2025
A feature fusion-based line structured light 3-D imaging method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenges of uneven illumination, background noise, and low contrast in laser stripe center extraction in industrial environments such as measurement, this paper proposes a line laser 3D measurement method based on feature fusion. First, a multi-feature fusion detection model is constructed to obtain the brightness feature map and region-enhanced feature map of the laser stripe. Then, wavelet transform is used to fuse the brightness feature map and the region-enhanced feature map, followed by segmentation of the fused feature map using an adaptive maximum entropy method. Next, a gray-gravity method optimized by gradient direction and curvature is employed to determine the initial center points of the laser stripe. Finally, adaptive segmentation based on neighborhood differences is performed, and polynomial fitting is applied to the segmented stripes to obtain the final laser stripe centers. Experimental results show that, under a noise variance of 0.3, the maximum error in laser stripe extraction is less than 1.07 pixels, the width error between different rows is less than 0.24 mm, and the mean error of repeatability extraction is less than 0.13 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.