Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073463›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Protective factors against technostress in secondary school teachers.

Pierpaolo Zivi, Gianluca Malatesta, Maria Lidia Mascia, Maria Grazia Diana, Alberto Di Domenico, Maria Pietronilla Penna, Massimiliano Palmiero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pierpaolo ZiviDepartment of Communication Sciences, University of Teramo, Via R. Balzarini 1, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Gianluca MalatestaDepartment of Psychology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Maria Lidia MasciaDepartment of History, Human Sciences and Education, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Maria Grazia DianaDepartment of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Alberto Di DomenicoDepartment of Psychology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Maria Pietronilla PennaDepartment of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Massimiliano PalmieroDepartment of Communication Sciences, University of Teramo, Via R. Balzarini 1, 64100, Teramo, Italy. mpalmiero@unite.it.

Funding

Ministry of University and Research (MUR) of Italy PRIN 2022 PNRR (P202259MEA_01)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliance on innovative learning and teaching methodologies based on Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) is continuously growing in educational institutions. However, using ICTs requires up-to-date knowledge, digital skills, and flexible adaptation to technological changes and challenges. These demands can lead teachers to experience technostress, undermining their ability to cope with emerging technologies and fully exploit their potential. This is particularly true for teachers who lack appropriate emotion regulation strategies and digital proficiency. In the present study, we investigated technostress creators among secondary school teachers, evaluating the predictive role of cognitive emotion regulation and the mediating role of self-efficacy in digital competencies. Notably, adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies were distinguished to clarify their distinct contributions to teachers' psychological experience of technostress creators. Mediation analyses highlighted a direct effect of maladaptive strategies on the experience of technostress creators, whereas adaptive strategies exerted an indirect effect through self-efficacy in digital competencies. Maladaptive emotion regulation was positively associated with higher levels of technostress creators, whereas adaptive emotion regulation was positively associated with self-efficacy in digital competencies. Self-efficacy in digital competencies, in turn, was negatively associated with the experience of technostress creators. These findings provide evidence for implementing not only emotion regulation-based but also digital self-efficacy-based interventions to mitigate teachers' technostress.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationSchool TeachersAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtective FactorsSchoolsSelf EfficacyCognitive emotion regulationDigital proficiencySecondary educationSelf-efficacyTechnostress

Identifiers

PMID41073463
PMCPMC12514290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.