ArticleScientific reports2025
Accurate prediction of green hydrogen production based on solid oxide electrolysis cell via soft computing algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward Efficient and Reliable Chemical Upgrading Using Solid Oxide Electrochemical Reactors, Mechanisms, Challenges, and Design Principles.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) presents significant potential for transforming renewable energy into green hydrogen. Traditional modeling approaches, however, are constrained by their applicability to specific SOEC systems. This study aims to develop robust, data-driven models that accurately capture the complex relationships between input and output parameters within the hydrogen production process. To achieve this, advanced machine learning techniques were utilized, including Random Forests (RFs), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Elastic Net, Ridge and Lasso Regressions, Decision Trees (DTs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machines (LightGBM), CatBoost, and Gaussian Process. These models were trained and validated using a dataset consisting of 351 data points, with performance evaluated through various metrics and visual methods. The dataset's suitability for model training was confirmed using the Monte Carlo outlier detection method. Results indicate that within the dataset and evaluation framework of this study, ANNs, CNNs, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost models have demonstrated high accuracy and reliability, achieving the largest R-squared scores and the smallest error metrics. Sensitivity analysis reveals that all input parameters significantly influence hydrogen production magnitude. Game-theoretic SHAP values underline current and cathode electrode conditions as critical factors. This research determines the performance of machine learning models, particularly ANNs, CNNs, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost, in predicting hydrogen production through the SOEC process. The outcomes of this paper can provide a certain reference for related research and applications in the hydrogen production field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.