ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated radiomics model for prediction of therapy response and minimal residual disease from baseline MRI in multiple myeloma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multicenter imaging study aimed to establish and validate automated radiomics models predicting therapy response (TR) and minimal residual response (MRD) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) from baseline MRI. Retrospectively, 118 MM patients from the GMMG-HD7 trial (EudraCT: 2017-004768-37) with data on TR and/or MRD after induction therapy and baseline MRI were included. Data were split by center into a training set (center 1-2; n = 79) and a test set (center 3-10; n = 39). TR was classified as very good partial response or better versus other. An in-house developed nnU-Net was used to automatically segment pelvic bone marrow for the subsequent extraction of 245 radiomics features and piriformis muscle for normalization. Random forest classifiers were trained using radiomics features only (I), radiomics features with additional confounders (II) or myeloma-relevant clinical features (III), or only clinical features (IV) to predict TR or MRD status. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess prediction performance. The prediction model using only radiomics features (I) showed the highest predictive performance for TR on the test set with an AUROC of 0.70. AUROC values for radiomics-based prediction of the MRD status (I-III) ranged from 0.54 to 0.52. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the potential of automated radiomics models from baseline MRI to non-invasively predict TR in MM on an independent, multicentric test set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.