Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automated radiomics model for prediction of therapy response and minimal residual disease from baseline MRI in multiple myeloma.

Fabian Bauer, Marina Hajiyianni, Niels Weinhold, Martin Grözinger, Jessica Kächele, Ekaterina Menis, Marc-Steffen Raab, Sandra Sauer, Anna Jauch, Tim F Weber and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Fabian Bauer *Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. fabian.bauer@uk-koeln.de.
Marina Hajiyianni *Internal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Niels WeinholdInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin GrözingerDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jessica KächeleDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ekaterina MenisInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marc-Steffen RaabInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sandra SauerInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna JauchInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tim F WeberDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel DebicDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Britta BesemerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72016, Tübingen, Germany.
Marius HorgerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72016, Tübingen, Germany.
Saif AfatDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72016, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin HoffmannMedical Clinic A, Ludwigshafen Clinical Center, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Johannes HoffendDepartment of Radiology, Ludwigshafen Clinical Center, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Doris KraemerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josefs Hospital Hagen, 58097, Hagen, Germany.
Ullrich GraevenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Adrian RingelsteinDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Jan DürigMVZ Essen-Nord, St. Augustinus MVZ GmbH, Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
Lale UmutluDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45141, Essen, Germany.
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hartmut GoldschmidtInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus Maier-HeinDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan DelormeDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elias K MaiInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus Wennmann *Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter Neher *Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multicenter imaging study aimed to establish and validate automated radiomics models predicting therapy response (TR) and minimal residual response (MRD) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) from baseline MRI. Retrospectively, 118 MM patients from the GMMG-HD7 trial (EudraCT: 2017-004768-37) with data on TR and/or MRD after induction therapy and baseline MRI were included. Data were split by center into a training set (center 1-2; n = 79) and a test set (center 3-10; n = 39). TR was classified as very good partial response or better versus other. An in-house developed nnU-Net was used to automatically segment pelvic bone marrow for the subsequent extraction of 245 radiomics features and piriformis muscle for normalization. Random forest classifiers were trained using radiomics features only (I), radiomics features with additional confounders (II) or myeloma-relevant clinical features (III), or only clinical features (IV) to predict TR or MRD status. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess prediction performance. The prediction model using only radiomics features (I) showed the highest predictive performance for TR on the test set with an AUROC of 0.70. AUROC values for radiomics-based prediction of the MRD status (I-III) ranged from 0.54 to 0.52. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the potential of automated radiomics models from baseline MRI to non-invasively predict TR in MM on an independent, multicentric test set.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedBone MarrowFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeMinimal residual disease.MRIMultiple myelomaRadiomicsTherapy response

Identifiers

PMID41073448
PMCPMC12514200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.