ArticleScientific reports2025
Inverse solution of process parameters in gear grinding using hierarchical bayesian physics informed neural network (HBPINN).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate inverse solution of process parameters by surface roughness is crucial for precision gear grinding processes. When inversely solving process parameters, model parameters are typically obtained by fitting experimental data. However, model parameters exhibit complex correlations and uncertainties, posing significant challenges to the inverse solution of process parameters. To address these challenges, the study proposes a hierarchical Bayesian physics-informed neural network (HBPINN) for the inverse solution of gear-grinding process parameters. An innovative global-group-individual level hierarchical structure is constructed for model parameters. Correlation analysis among model parameters is conducted through group effects within a hierarchical Bayesian framework, followed by uncertainty analysis. Then, multivariate regression functions describing the relationship between process parameters and surface roughness are constructed to form the physics loss function. The regularization incorporates the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence of model parameters, integrating with the empirical loss function. Furthermore, datasets of different scales were established through Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithms. Compared with Bayesian physics-informed neural network (BPINN), variational inference Bayesian physics-informed neural network (VI-BPINN), and physics-informed neural network (PINN), HBPINN demonstrates superior performance in terms of both efficiency and accuracy. With a training set size of 200, HBPINN reduced prediction time by 4-10 times and achieved an average R² of 0.9629. The model demonstrates excellent uncertainty quantification capabilities and robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.