Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073428›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Intelligent data driven assessment of physical education programs using circular intuitionistic fuzzy MAIRCA CRITIC model.

Xiaofei Shi, Fei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaofei ShiPhysical Education, Handan University, Handan, Hebei, 056004, China. feiaiping1983@126.com.
Fei LiPhysical Education, Handan University, Handan, Hebei, 056004, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an intelligent multi-criteria evaluation framework for physical education (PE) systems by integrating the circular intuitionistic fuzzy (CIF) environment with a hybrid MAIRCA (multi-attributive ideal-real comparative analysis)-CRITIC(criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation) approach. Testing PE programs and establishing their effects and influences is usually done in vague and inaccurate circumstances. Hence, conventional models find it difficult to cope effectively. This should be overcome by creating a more sophisticated framework that uses circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets (CIFS) to model hesitation and conflicting information, thus supporting the robustness of the decision. Alternative ranking by the proximity of preferences is utilized using the MAIRCA method, and objective criteria weighting is realized due to contrast intensity and assessment of conflicts with the CRITIC method. The combination provides the opportunity to be subjective and objective in measurement with the combined approach and evaluation strategy. The model is considered in a practical situation where it deals with several PE programs, and the obtained outcomes show that it is more accurate, specifically in ranking, yet flexible in treating vague information. The framework is good at assisting educational policymakers, but also helps enhance and utilize resources in PE systems.

Indexed as

Circular intuitionistic fuzzy setCRITIC methodDecision makingMAIRCA methodPhysical education

Identifiers

PMID41073428
PMCPMC12514171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.