Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073424›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

A next-generation anti-CTLA-4 probody mitigates toxicity and enhances anti-tumor immunity in mice.

Weian Cao, Junfan Chen, Yutong Fu, Haitao Jiang, Yu Gao, Huiming Huang, Yang-Xin Fu, Wenyan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weian Cao *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Junfan Chen *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yutong Fu *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Haitao JiangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5834-0968
Yu GaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Huiming HuangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yang-Xin FuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. yangxinfu@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-6617
Wenyan WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. wywang2022@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7663-9124

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32370967National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82250710684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CTLA-4 is a promising target for immune checkpoint inhibition in cancer therapy, with CTLA-4 blockade achieving prolonged overall survival for responding patients. However, the progressively elevated doses of anti-CTLA-4 agents, aimed at achieving better efficacy, result in increased toxicities, limiting their clinical applications. Here, we generate a prodrug design of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody, named ProCTLA-4, by folding the Fab fragment of the antibody in a tumor-associated protease-based manner. In preclinical mouse models, ProCTLA-4 effectively depletes suppressive regulatory T cells within the tumor microenvironment and enhances tumor-associated antigen-specific CD8

Indexed as

CTLA-4 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryTumor MicroenvironmentCTLA-4 AntigenCtla4 protein, mouseImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoglobulin Fab Fragments

Identifiers

PMID41073424
PMCPMC12514261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.