ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
A microfluidic platform for the co-culturing of microtissues with continuously recirculating suspension cells.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelling inflammatory endothelial dysfunction: a human in vitro platform for translational research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- From microfluidics to nanodelivery: artificial intelligence reshapes neuropharmacology research strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches often fails to reliably predict efficacy and toxicity, especially when recapitulating conditions involving recirculating cells. Current testing strategies are often based on static co-culturing of cells in suspension and 3D tissue models, where cell sedimentation on the target tissue can occur. The observed effects may then mostly be a consequence of sedimentation and of the corresponding forced cell-tissue interactions. The realization of continuous medium flow helps to better recapitulate physiological conditions and cell-tissue interactions. To tackle current limitations of perfused organ-on-chip approaches, we developed a microfluidic chip and operation concept, which prevents undesired sedimentation and accumulation of suspended cells during multiple days by relying on gravity-driven perfusion. Our platform, which we termed "human immune flow (hiFlow) chip", enables to co-culture cells in suspension with up to 7 preformed microtissue models. Here, we present the design principle and operation of the platform, and we validate its performance by culturing cells and microtissues of a variety of different origins. Cells and tissues could be monitored on chip via high-resolution microscopy, while cell suspensions and microtissues could be easily retrieved for off-chip analysis. Our results demonstrate that primary immune cells and a range of different spheroid models of healthy and diseased tissues can be maintained for over 6 days on chip. As proof-of-concept cell-tissue interaction assay, we used an antibody treatment against diffuse midline glioma, a highly aggressive pediatric tumor. We are confident that our platform will help to increase the prediction power of in vitro preclinical testing of novel therapeutics that rely on the interaction of circulating cells with organ tissues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.