Trial reportBMJ open respiratory research2025
Sputum colour charts to guide antibiotic self-treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Colour-COPD RCT.
Trial report in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are encouraged to manage exacerbations (acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD)) through self-management (SM) plans. Since only around half of AECOPD are bacterial, and sputum colour correlates with bacterial load, it may help guide antibiotic use. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessed the safety and effectiveness of using a sputum colour chart in UK primary care.
methodsThe multicentre RCT, Colour COPD randomised COPD adults who had ≥2 AECOPD or ≥1 AECOPD hospital admission in the preceding year. The primary objective was to assess the non-inferiority of the Bronkotest sputum colour chart compared with usual care, with hospital admission for AECOPD at 12 months as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included second courses of treatment requirement and quality of life (CAT score). Nested substudies examined daily symptoms via e-diaries and sputum culture.
results115 severe COPD patients (global obstructive lung disease(GOLD) D, 54% Medical Research Council (MRC) 4 or 5, CAT score 24) were randomised. A trend towards more hospital admissions (32% vs 16%, relative risk (RR) 1.95 (0.92-4.18)) and increased antibiotic use within 14 days (34% vs 18%, adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.80 (0.85-3.79)) was seen in the colour chart group. From 38 sputum substudy patients, 57 samples were received (42 stable, 15 during AECOPD), with 30% containing potentially pathogenic bacterium (PPB). Purulent sputum was more frequent in bronchiectasis, independent of disease state (stable vs exacerbation) or PPB presence, suggesting sputum colour alone does not reliably guide antibiotic use.
conclusionUnder-recruitment precluded definitive conclusions. However, sputum colour is unlikely to be a useful addition to COPD SM in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The UK's Clinical Study Registry: ISRCTN14955629 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14955629; registration date: 11 Number 2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.