ArticleBMJ open2025
Symptom tracking for endometriosis: a systematic review protocol for mobile applications focused on content, inclusivity and features.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition affecting 2%-10% of women worldwide, often leading to severe pain, organ dysfunction and infertility. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis is frequently delayed, and treatment options remain limited. Mobile health (mHealth) applications have gained popularity as tools for symptom tracking, yet concerns about their accessibility, evidence-based content and inclusivity persist. Ensuring that these digital tools are culturally relevant, user-friendly and available to diverse populations is crucial for improving patient care and engagement. This study aims to systematically review mobile applications designed for tracking endometriosis symptoms, with a focus on content quality, inclusivity and functionality. The objective is to identify gaps in existing apps and provide recommendations for developing more inclusive digital health solutions.
methodThis study follows a systematic review methodology proposed by Gasteiger DISCUSSION: This systematic review of applications offers an overview of available apps that can be downloaded in Switzerland. Furthermore, it will present a detailed analysis of those that are specifically geared towards symptom tracking and will evaluate the level of evidence-based content, inclusivity, data protection and quality. A key strength of this review is its multidisciplinary approach, which involves engaging experts in healthcare, digital technology, inclusivity and individuals with lived experiences with endometriosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval from an ethics committee is not required. Data and material will be available on request from the authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.