Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073121›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Additional arm-hand boost therapy (AHA-BOOST) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting during the subacute phase after stroke: protocol for a randomised controlled trial including a clinical, process and health economic evaluation.

Liesel Cornelis, Lisa Cruycke, Sarah Meyer, Ann De Smedt, Maaike Fobelets, Marc Michielsen, Maaiken Vander Plaetse, Koen Putman, Geert Verheyden

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06517251 (Aha BOOST Arm-hand BOOST Therapy to Enhance Recovery After Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06517251 narecruitingnot on this map

Aha BOOST Arm-hand BOOST Therapy to Enhance Recovery After Stroke: Clinical, Health Economic and Process Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2024 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsStrokeArmsArm-hand BOOST, Lower limb BOOST
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liesel Cornelis *Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium liesel.cornelis@kuleuven.be lisa.cruycke@vub.be koen.putman@vub.be geert.verheyden@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5610-8420
Lisa Cruycke *Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium liesel.cornelis@kuleuven.be lisa.cruycke@vub.be koen.putman@vub.be geert.verheyden@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7916-8805
Sarah MeyerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5649-3171
Ann De SmedtSTIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0252-0600
Maaike FobeletsFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-6422
Marc MichielsenREVA HERK, Jessa Hospital Campus Sint-Ursula, Herk-de-Stad, Belgium.
Maaiken Vander PlaetseREVA HERK, Jessa Hospital Campus Sint-Ursula, Herk-de-Stad, Belgium.
Koen PutmanInteruniversity Centre for Health Economics Research, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium liesel.cornelis@kuleuven.be lisa.cruycke@vub.be koen.putman@vub.be geert.verheyden@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-3759
Geert VerheydenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium liesel.cornelis@kuleuven.be lisa.cruycke@vub.be koen.putman@vub.be geert.verheyden@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-8175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA considerable number of patients present with an upper limb impairment after stroke, which has a significant impact on daily life activities and quality of life. Currently, based on a Cochrane review, there is no high-quality evidence for any of the upper limb interventions used in routine practice. Therefore, the Jessa Hospital developed an additional arm-hand boost programme (AHA-BOOST), a novel, stratified intervention that integrates neurophysiological knowledge with an early start to optimise poststroke upper limb recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre randomised controlled trial with parallel design compares AHA-BOOST with a dose-matched programme for the lower limbs. Both interventions are in addition to usual care and consist of a combination of group sessions (1 hour per day, 5 times per week) and individualised therapy (two 30 min sessions per week) provided over 4 weeks. In total, 80 subacute stroke patients will be recruited from five rehabilitation centres in Belgium and randomised to one of both interventions. Patients will be followed up until 12 months post stroke to support a cost-utility analysis and assess long-term clinical effects of the programme. Various outcomes are collected at different time points: preintervention, immediately post intervention, 3 months post intervention, 6 months post stroke and 12 months post stroke. The Action Research Arm Test is the clinical primary outcome. The secondary outcomes are: Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity, Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale, Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale, Stroke Impact Scale and EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). The clinical analysis includes a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) analysis for comparing clinical changes between both groups and a subgroup analysis to explore the effects in different types of stroke survivors. Additionally, a process evaluation, guided by the Medical Research Council Framework, will assess key aspects of the implementation, including delivery (structures and resources), dose, reach, fidelity, adaptations, quality, mechanisms of change and the context. Both quantitative and qualitative data will be collected using the following tools during the intervention: therapy diaries for each session; video recordings of AHA-BOOST group sessions and after the intervention using: interviews with patients, therapists and management. The qualitative data will be assessed using content and thematic analysis and the quantitative data with descriptive statistics. Ultimately, in addition to the EQ-5D-5L, direct and indirect healthcare costs are collected for the health economic evaluation. A cost-utility analysis will be performed with a time horizon of 12 months post stroke comparing both therapies, and a Markov model will assess the cost-effectiveness of AHA-BOOST on a lifetime horizon. To test the robustness of the results, sensitivity and scenario analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained by different ethical committees (UZ/KU Leuven (central committee), UZ Gent, Gasthuiszusters Antwerpen and Maria Middelares). The study will be performed in accordance with the protocol, current International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) and Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines, and applicable regulatory requirements. The current approved protocol is version 5, dated 7 May 2025. Protocol amendments will be submitted to all involved ethical committees. The study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and stakeholder reports. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06517251.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityActivities of Daily LivingArmBelgiumClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHandHumansInpatientsMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHEALTH ECONOMICSImplementation ScienceInpatientsRandomized Controlled TrialREHABILITATION MEDICINEStroke

Identifiers

PMID41073121
PMCPMC12517014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.