Observational studyBMJ open2025
Development and validation of a model for predicting depression risk in primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a cross-sectional retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrimary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH), characterised by excessive palm sweating, significantly impacts patients' physiology, psychology, self-esteem, work, life and social interactions. The incidence of depression is higher among PPH patients. Timely detection of key predictive factors and the development of risk prediction models are crucial for effective intervention and treatment in this patient group.
designWe conducted an in-depth analysis of clinical data from 926 PPH patients treated at the Thoracic Surgery Department of Beijing Haidian Hospital between 2016 and 2021. We used the Boruta algorithm alongside the Backward Elimination strategy to select predictive factors and constructed five machine-learning models. By evaluating these models' performance, we determined the optimal one. Additionally, we introduced the Shapley Additive exPlanations method to enhance the interpretability of this optimal model.
resultsThe Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 score, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale score, family history, quality of life excluding PPH, onset age and the age when PPH begins to impact life (Impact age) are six predictive factors for depression in PPH patients. The support vector machine (SVM) model performs more comprehensively through model validation. In the validation set, the area under the curve is 0.798 (95% CI: 0.737 to 0.859), with a Brier score of 0.1451 (95% CI: 0.1233 to 0.1716), accuracy of 0.7184, sensitivity of 0.775, specificity of 0.699 and F1 score of 0.585.
conclusionsThese findings can enhance our understanding of depression in PPH patients, and the SVM model is a valuable screening tool for assessing the risk of depression in PPH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.