ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Machine learning model to classify chronic leg wounds and identify pyoderma gangrenosum.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesChronic wounds represent a significant economic and personal burden. For their successful treatment, the causes must be known and treated. Wounds caused by pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), a rare inflammatory skin disease, are often misdiagnosed. This study, therefore, aims to develop a machine learning model capable of differentiating PG from other wound types, focusing on chronic leg wounds to address this diagnostic challenge.
methodsWe used 3674 wound photographs from three specialised wound centres with the four most common types of foot and leg ulcers and the rare inflammatory differential diagnosis PG. The convolutional neural network classifier ConvNeXt 'B' was pretrained on LAION2B, ImageNet12k and ImageNet 1k before being trained and fine-tuned on an 85:15 train, validation split.
resultsThe model achieved an overall high accuracy in multiclass classification of the chronic wounds (unbalanced accuracy 90%, balanced accuracy 87%). The sensitivity for identifying PG was 94%, while the sensitivity forother chronic wound types was 97% for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), 92% for venous leg ulcers (VLU), 78% for mixed leg ulcers and 74% for arterial leg ulcers. DISCUSSION: The machine learning model effectively differentiates PG from the most common leg and foot ulcers and was very accurate for classifying DFU and VLU. A higher rate of misclassifications occurred for the other vascular ulcers, that is, mixed and arterial leg ulcers. This aligns with the challenges in clinical practice.
conclusionDespite the limited number of wound images, this novel multiclass wound classification model accurately identified PG and differentiated leg and foot ulcer subtypes, providing a foundation for a diagnostic support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.