ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Characterizing and predicting refractory rumination in obsessive compulsive disorder.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rumination is problematic for individuals with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and yet, is not addressed in standard treatment for OCD. Further, little is known about whether rumination improves following exposure and response prevention treatment and for whom. The present study sought to characterize the extent to which patients receiving partial hospitalization/residential treatment for OCD (N = 283) continued to struggle with rumination post-treatment. Next, baseline demographic and clinical data was used in two machine learning models to identify pre-treatment predictors of which patients were most likely to struggle with elevated rumination at discharge. Lastly, a mixed-effects model was used to assess the impact of elevated rumination at discharge on patients' OCD symptom severity at discharge, 1, 6, and 12-month follow up assessments. In this sample, rumination change from admission to discharge was minimal, and over one-third of patients did not experience any change in their rumination severity. Elastic net and random forest models predicted approximately 20 % of the out-of-sample predictive R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.