ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2025
Clinical potential of whole-genome data linked to mortality statistics in patients with breast cancer in the UK: a retrospective analysis.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Male breast cancer: from extrapolated practice to evidence-based care.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Comprehensive comparison of homologous recombination deficiency predictors in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- High-depth whole genome sequencing of premalignant breast lesions reveals rearrangement hotspots and personalized management opportunities.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Can whole genome data analysis be used to personalize breast cancer care?Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- Homologous recombination deficiency in primary ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Reprogramming tumor immunity through APOBEC3s-mediated mutagenesis: from genome instability to immune checkpoint interactions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. Survival is generally considered favourable, yet some patients remain at risk of early death. We aimed to assess whether comprehensive whole-genome sequencing (WGS) linked to mortality data could add prognostic value to existing clinical measures and identify patients who might respond to targeted therapeutics.
methodsIn this integrative, retrospective analysis, we analysed 2445 breast cancer tumours (any stage and molecular subtype) collected from 2403 patients recruited through 13 National Health Service Genomic Medicine Centres or hospitals in England affiliated to the 100 000 Genomes Project (100kGP) between 2012 and 2018. We linked 2208 (90%) cases with clinical data; mortality data were obtained for 1188 patients. Following high-depth WGS of tumour and matched normal DNA, we performed comprehensive WGS profiling seeking driver mutations, mutational signatures, and compound algorithmic scores for homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), mismatch repair deficiency, and tumour mutational burden. Data from 1803 additional patients with breast cancer from three independent cohorts were used to validate various findings. To evaluate the prognostic value of WGS features, we performed univariable and multivariable Cox regression on data from patients with stage I-III, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with a cancer-specific mortality endpoint (around 5-year follow-up).
findingsAmong 2445 tumours in the 100kGP breast cancer cohort, we observed genomic characteristics with immediate personalised medicine potential in 656 (26·8%), including features reporting HRD (298 [12·2%] total cases and 76 [6·3%] ER-positive, HER2-negative cases), highly individualised driver events, mutations underpinning resistance to endocrine therapy, and mutational signatures indicating therapeutic vulnerabilities. 373 (15·2%) cases had WGS features with potential for translational research, including compromised base excision repair and non-homologous end-joining dependency. Structural variation burden (hazard ratio 3·9 [95 CI% 2·4-6·2]; p<0·0001), high levels of APOBEC signatures (2·5 [1·6-4·1]; p<0·0001), and TP53 drivers (3·9 [2·4-6·2]; p<0·0001) were independently prognostic of customary clinical measures (age at diagnosis, stage, and grade) in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. We developed a prognosticator for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer capable of identifying patients who require either increased intervention or therapy de-escalation, validating the framework in the independent Swedish Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast (SCAN-B) dataset.
interpretationWe show that breast cancer genomes are rich in predictive and prognostic value. We propose a two-step model for effective clinical application. First, the identification of candidates for targeted therapies or clinical trials using highly individualised genomic markers. Second, for patients without such features, the implementation of enhanced prognostication using genomic features alongside existing clinical decision-making factors.
fundingNational Institute of Health Research, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Dr Josef Steiner Cancer Research Award 2019, Basser Gray Prime Award 2020, Cancer Research UK, Sir Jeffrey Cheah Early Career Fellowship, the Mats Paulsson Foundation, the Fru Berta Kamprads Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41072453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.