Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41072453›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2025

Clinical potential of whole-genome data linked to mortality statistics in patients with breast cancer in the UK: a retrospective analysis.

Daniella Black, Helen Ruth Davies, Gene Ching Chiek Koh, Lucia Chmelova, Marko Cubric, Georgia Chalivelaki Chan, Andrea Degasperi, Jan Czarnecki, Ping Jing Toong, Yasin Memari and 20 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Daniella BlackDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Helen Ruth DaviesDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Lifebit Biotech, London, UK.
Gene Ching Chiek KohDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Sir Jeffrey Cheah Sunway Medical School, Faculty of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia.
Lucia ChmelovaDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Marko CubricGenomics England, London, UK.
Georgia Chalivelaki ChanGenomics England, London, UK.
Andrea DegasperiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jan CzarneckiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ping Jing ToongDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yasin MemariDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
James WhitworthDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Salome Jingchen ZhaoDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yogesh KumarDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Shadi BasyuniDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Giuseppe RinaldiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Scott ShooterDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vladyslav DembrovskyiLifebit Biotech, London, UK.
Rosie DaviesLifebit Biotech, London, UK.
Maria Chatzou DunfordLifebit Biotech, London, UK.
Ellen CopsonCancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Carlo PalmieriThe Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer, Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Åke BorgDivision of Oncology & Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
John AmbroseGenomics England, London, UK.
Catey BunceBreast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; NIHR Institute of Cancer Research BRC, London, UK.
Alona SosinskyGenomics England, London, UK.
Prabhu ArumugamGenomics England, London, UK.
Matthew Arthur BrownGenomics England, London, UK.
Johan StaafDivision of Oncology & Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Nicholas TurnerBreast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; NIHR Institute of Cancer Research BRC, London, UK.
Serena Nik-ZainalDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: sn206@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. Survival is generally considered favourable, yet some patients remain at risk of early death. We aimed to assess whether comprehensive whole-genome sequencing (WGS) linked to mortality data could add prognostic value to existing clinical measures and identify patients who might respond to targeted therapeutics.

methodsIn this integrative, retrospective analysis, we analysed 2445 breast cancer tumours (any stage and molecular subtype) collected from 2403 patients recruited through 13 National Health Service Genomic Medicine Centres or hospitals in England affiliated to the 100 000 Genomes Project (100kGP) between 2012 and 2018. We linked 2208 (90%) cases with clinical data; mortality data were obtained for 1188 patients. Following high-depth WGS of tumour and matched normal DNA, we performed comprehensive WGS profiling seeking driver mutations, mutational signatures, and compound algorithmic scores for homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), mismatch repair deficiency, and tumour mutational burden. Data from 1803 additional patients with breast cancer from three independent cohorts were used to validate various findings. To evaluate the prognostic value of WGS features, we performed univariable and multivariable Cox regression on data from patients with stage I-III, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with a cancer-specific mortality endpoint (around 5-year follow-up).

findingsAmong 2445 tumours in the 100kGP breast cancer cohort, we observed genomic characteristics with immediate personalised medicine potential in 656 (26·8%), including features reporting HRD (298 [12·2%] total cases and 76 [6·3%] ER-positive, HER2-negative cases), highly individualised driver events, mutations underpinning resistance to endocrine therapy, and mutational signatures indicating therapeutic vulnerabilities. 373 (15·2%) cases had WGS features with potential for translational research, including compromised base excision repair and non-homologous end-joining dependency. Structural variation burden (hazard ratio 3·9 [95 CI% 2·4-6·2]; p<0·0001), high levels of APOBEC signatures (2·5 [1·6-4·1]; p<0·0001), and TP53 drivers (3·9 [2·4-6·2]; p<0·0001) were independently prognostic of customary clinical measures (age at diagnosis, stage, and grade) in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. We developed a prognosticator for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer capable of identifying patients who require either increased intervention or therapy de-escalation, validating the framework in the independent Swedish Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast (SCAN-B) dataset.

interpretationWe show that breast cancer genomes are rich in predictive and prognostic value. We propose a two-step model for effective clinical application. First, the identification of candidates for targeted therapies or clinical trials using highly individualised genomic markers. Second, for patients without such features, the implementation of enhanced prognostication using genomic features alongside existing clinical decision-making factors.

fundingNational Institute of Health Research, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Dr Josef Steiner Cancer Research Award 2019, Basser Gray Prime Award 2020, Cancer Research UK, Sir Jeffrey Cheah Early Career Fellowship, the Mats Paulsson Foundation, the Fru Berta Kamprads Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsWhole Genome SequencingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.