ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2026
Long-term risk of tuberculosis among individuals with Xpert Ultra trace screening results in Uganda: a longitudinal follow-up study.
Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and Emerging Diagnostic Approaches for Tuberculosis in People Living with HIV: Challenges and Future Perspectives.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Community-based chest X-ray screening versus symptom-based case presentation in the elderly: evidence from three consecutive years of data.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- "Subclinical tuberculosis": a person-centred critique.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Unexpected detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in US-born patients in putative association with clinical syndromes.Nature communications · 2026Observational
- A Year in Review on Tuberculosis and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria Disease: A 2026 Update for Clinicians and Scientists.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
- The microbiological diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis: focus on the Ultra test.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2026Article
- Evaluating smartphone-based cough frequency monitoring for tuberculosis screening and triage in Uganda: A mixed-methods evaluation.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Performance of universal and stratified computer-aided detection thresholds for chest x-ray-based tuberculosis screening: a cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study.The Lancet. Digital health · 2025Article
- Do no harm - re-evaluating the risks of overtreatment in community-wide tuberculosis screening.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Cumulative TB disease burden following sputum Xpert Ultra 'Trace' results in clinical settings: Results from a multi-site observational clinical study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSystematic screening for tuberculosis using Xpert Ultra can generate trace results of uncertain significance. Additional microbiological testing in this context is often negative, but untreated individuals might still progress to culture-positive disease. We aimed to estimate the 2-year risk of tuberculosis among screened participants with trace-positive sputum (PWTS).
methodsIn this longitudinal follow-up study, we conducted Ultra-based systematic screening for tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda, from Feb 2, 2021, to April 27, 2024, enrolling PWTS as well as participants who were Ultra-positive or Ultra-negative controls. Recruitment occurred primarily through community-based screening events and door-to-door screening. Ultra sputum testing was offered to individuals aged 15 years or older who were not on active tuberculosis treatment, regardless of their symptoms. All PWTS, as well as age-matched and sex-matched participants with negative screening results and consecutive participants with positive screening results, were recruited. Participants underwent extensive initial evaluation, and untreated PWTS and negative-control participants were followed up with re-testing for up to 24 months. Our primary outcome was the cumulative hazard of tuberculosis among PWTS, using two definitions of tuberculosis: one incorporating clinician judgement and one strictly microbiological. We then compared hazards between PWTS and negative-control participants. We also assessed whether the presence of symptoms or chest x-ray abnormalities at baseline were associated with tuberculosis diagnosis during follow-up in PWTS.
findingsWe screened 31 505 people for tuberculosis in Uganda using sputum Xpert Ultra as an initial test through event-based and door-to-door screening. We enrolled 128 PWTS and 139 age-matched and sex-matched control participants who were Ultra-negative (negative-control participants) into prospective cohorts and 110 control participants who were Ultra-positive (more than trace) for cross-sectional comparison. Of 128 PWTS, 79 (62%) were male, 49 (38%) were female, and 19 (15%) were HIV positive; 45 (35%) were recommended for treatment upon enrolment, eight (6%) were lost to follow-up within 3 months, and 75 (56%) were followed up for a median of 706 days (IQR 344-714), of whom 19 (25%) were recommended for treatment during follow-up. The cumulative hazard of tuberculosis among PWTS not treated at baseline was 0·24 (95% CI 0·15-0·40) at 1 year and 0·33 (0·21-0·54) at 2 years, versus 0·03 (0·01-0·10) at 2 years for negative-control participants. Hazards were similar for microbiologically defined tuberculosis (0·36 [95% CI 0·22-0·58] for PWTS vs 0·02 [0·01-0·10] for negative-control participants at 2 years). Tuberculosis diagnosis during follow-up was strongly associated with atypical baseline chest x-ray (ie, interpreted by radiologists as having any abnormality; hazard ratio 14·6 [95% CI 3·3-63·8]) but not with baseline symptoms (cough, fever, night sweats, or weight loss).
interpretationIndividuals with trace-positive sputum during screening have a substantial 2-year risk of tuberculosis, even when extensive initial evaluations do not confirm disease. Treatment should be considered for most screening participants with trace-positive sputum and atypical chest imaging.
fundingNational Institutes of Health and the Gates Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.