Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071977›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Evaluation of the Comparative Efficacy of Honey Thermal Microcautery, Standard Physiotherapy, and

Shalini Pathania, Shweta Parwe, Punam Sawarkar, Milind Nisargandha

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shalini PathaniaMahatama Gandhi Ayurved College, Hospital And Research Centre, Salod, Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India.ORCID 0009-0000-8431-0513
Shweta ParweMahatama Gandhi Ayurved College, Hospital And Research Centre, Salod, Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6077-146X
Punam SawarkarMahatama Gandhi Ayurved College, Hospital And Research Centre, Salod, Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7980-7832
Milind NisargandhaSundarlal Patwa Government Medical College, Mandasaur, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6523-4797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frozen shoulder is an ailment that denotes dysfunction in the arm characterized by limited range of motion accompanied by pain. The prevalence of adhesive capsulitis is 3% to 5% in the general population and up to 20% in those with diabetes. Physiotherapy, analgesics, corticosteroids, and surgical capsulotomy are common forms of treatment. Administering oil through the nasal route (or nasya karma) is mentioned in the Ayurvedic scriptures for managing neck and clavicle disorders. Thermal microcautery (or agni karma) is a parasurgical procedure for treating related pathologies of bodily humors (vata and kapha). This study will aim to compare the efficacy of honey thermal microcautery, standard physiotherapy, and Sida cordifolia oil via nasal administration in the treatment of frozen shoulder to determine which provided the most relief. Objective: The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of honey thermal microcautery, standard physiotherapy, and S cordifolia oil via nasal administration using the visual analogue scale, range of motion, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire and compare these interventions. The secondary objective is to assess sustained relief in all 3 groups. Methods: We will enroll 60 patients, 20 in each group, for this single-blind assessor-controlled study. Group A will receive Ayurvedic treatment, that is, thermal microcautery using honey for 2 days (the first and seventh) and placebo capsules (twice per day) for 7 days, group B will receive standard physiotherapy and placebo capsules (twice per day) for 7 days, and group C will be given S cordifolia oil via nasal administration with 8 drops in each nostril and placebo capsules (twice per day) for 7 days. The evaluation parameters are pain (visual analogue scale), range of motion measured using a goniometer, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. On September 18, 2023, approval was received from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Mahatma Gandhi Ayurved College Hospital and Research Centre (MGACHRC/IEC/Sep-2023/740). Results: The results will be subjected to statistical analysis using appropriate methods such as ANOVA. If the ANOVA shows significance, post hoc tests (eg, the Tukey honestly significant difference test) will identify group differences, with P<.05 considered significant. As of January 2025, a total of 16 patients have been recruited, divided into 3 groups, and the final results are expected to be published in November 2025. Conclusions: This comparative study seeks to establish the most effective treatment among honey thermal microcautery, standard physiotherapy, and S cordifolia oil nasya for managing frozen shoulder, potentially offering new integrative approaches to treating this condition.

Indexed as

BursitisHoneyPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPlant OilsSida PlantAdultFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomePlant Oilsfrozen shoulderphysiotherapyplaceborange of motionSida cordifoliathermal microcautery

Identifiers

PMID41071977
PMCPMC12513683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.