ArticleAccounts of chemical research2025
On Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Silico Isomerization Produces Apt Negative Data for VHTS Validation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Natural Products in Epilepsy Treatment: From Traditional Medicine Towards Computational Drug Discovery.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Resolving the ambiguous binding site of quercetin at the calcineurin subunit junction using funnel metadynamics with deep learning collective variables.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Decoupling Size from Shape: Cellular Sheaf Laplacians as Ligand Geometry Descriptors for Binding Affinity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Computational Characterization of Pathogenic LMNA Missense Variants: Structural Instability, Altered Binding, and Conformational Dynamics.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Integrating network pharmacology, molecular docking and dynamics simulation to decipher the antipyretic mechanisms of Xiaochaihu granules.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Account discusses recent progress and challenges in binding free energy computations, focusing on two classes of enhanced sampling techniques: alchemical transformations and path-based methods. Binding free energy is a crucial metric in drug discovery, as it measures the affinity of a ligand for its target receptor. Free energy and affinity guide the ranking and selection of potential drug candidates. The theoretical foundations of free energy calculations were established several decades ago, but their efficient application to drug-target binding remains a grand challenge in computational drug design. The main obstacles stem from sampling issues (as binding is a rare event), force field accuracy limitations, and simulation convergence. Alchemical transformations are now the most used methods for computing binding free energies in the pharmaceutical industry. However, while they efficiently calculate energy differences, the application of these methods is often limited to relative binding free energy calculations. Absolute and accurate (error < 1 kcal/mol) binding free energy predictions remain one of the great challenges for computational chemists and physicists. Another limitation of alchemical methods is that they lack the ability to provide mechanistic or kinetic insights into the binding process, crucial for optimizing lead compounds and designing novel therapies. Path-based methods offer, in principle, the possibility to accurately estimate absolute binding free energy while also providing insights into binding pathways and interactions.This Account explores recent advances in binding free energy methods for drug-target recognition and binding. In particular, we discuss the similarities and differences between alchemical and path-based approaches, highlighting recent innovations in both families of methods and providing perspectives from our group's contributions. We examine the foundational role of alchemical methods, which have been employed since the inception of free energy calculations, in both equilibrium and nonequilibrium contexts. We also emphasize the growing importance of path-based methods in drug discovery and their ability to predict binding and unbinding pathways, free energy profiles, and binding free energy estimates. In particular, the combination of path methods with machine learning has proven to be a powerful means for accurate path generation and free energy estimations. Building on our recent research, we discuss several path-based applications for drug discovery. Moreover, we focus on two semiautomatic protocols representing our group's state-of-the-art in free energy calculations. The first protocol is based on MetaDynamics simulation. From this, a recent innovation is instead based on nonequilibrium simulations combined with nonequilibrium estimators. We discuss in depth the advantages and drawbacks of equilibrium and nonequilibrium approaches to drug-target binding free energy predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.