Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071939›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

Combined immunoscore and pan-immune inflammation value associated with pathological response and survival outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Jiang-Shan Huang, Qi-Hong Zhong, Ye-Qin Zhang, Huai-Yuan Zhang, Fei-Long Guo, Jing-Yu Wu, Sui Chen, Wen-Wei Lin, Zhen-Yang Zhang, Jiang-Bo Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Immunoscore based on CD3American journal of cancer research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiang-Shan HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qi-Hong ZhongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ye-Qin ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Huai-Yuan ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fei-Long GuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jing-Yu WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Sui ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Wen-Wei LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zhen-Yang ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jiang-Bo LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of combined tumor immunoscore (IS) and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) in assessing pathological response and survival following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

methodsA retrospective cohort of 226 ESCC patients undergoing NACI followed by surgery was analyzed. Local immune status was assessed via IS calculated from CD3⁺/CD8⁺ T-cell densities on immunohistochemical stained tumor sections. Systemic inflammation was measured by peripheral blood PIV. Patients were stratified by median values. The association of IS, PIV alone, and their combination for major pathological response (TRG 0-1) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated.

resultsThe pathological response rate was significantly higher in the high IS group versus the low IS group (54.3% vs. 38.6%; P = 0.023) and in the low PIV group p versus the high PIV group (67.3% vs. 21.2%; P < 0.001). In the combined model, the low IS + high PIV group (Group D) exhibited the lowest pathological response rate (32.0%) and a significantly increased risk of death compared with the optimal group [high IS + low PIV; Group A; hazard ratios = 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-4.77; P < 0.001]. The dual-parameter IS + PIV model demonstrated superior discriminatory performance: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84) for discriminating pathological response and AUC = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.88) for predicting 36-month OS, significantly outperforming single parameters and clinical staging.

conclusionThe IS + PIV dual-parameter model, by integrating local immune activity and systemic inflammatory status, accurately identifies NACI beneficiaries (high IS + low PIV) and high-risk patients (low IS + high PIV), providing an efficient prognostic tool for personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedEsophagectomyFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeesophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmunoscoreneoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapypan-immune inflammation valuepredictive biomarker

Identifiers

PMID41071939
PMCPMC12825662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.