Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071928›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025

Wild strains reveal natural variation in C. elegans avoidance behaviors.

Emily A Polk, Alber Aqil, J B Collins, Robyn E Tanny, Erik C Andersen, Omer Gokcumen, Denise M Ferkey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phosphodiesterases RegulatemicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily A PolkDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, United States.
Alber AqilDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6784-6495
J B CollinsDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.
Robyn E TannyDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.
Erik C AndersenDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.
Omer GokcumenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4371-679X
Denise M FerkeyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, United States.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Evolutionary and functional impact of common genomic structural variationsR35GM156519 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI Omer Gokcumen · 2025 to 2026
$887k
Human Frontiers Science Foundation RGP0001/2019National Science Foundation DEB-2049947National Science Foundation IOS-2334104NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156519NIH HHS P40 OD010440NIH HHS R35GM156519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical stimuli, including odorants and tastants, provide information about food availability and allow animals to avoid harmful environments. Over 6 decades of research using primarily 1 laboratory-adapted strain of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has yielded a wealth of information about how this animal senses and responds to chemical cues to survive. However, it was not known whether the chemosensory behavioral profile of this strain (named N2) is representative of the species. Using a collection of hundreds of wild C. elegans strains collected from around the globe, we assessed their abilities to respond to 3 aversive stimuli (the bitter tastant quinine, the heavy metal copper, and the detergent SDS) in a laboratory setting and found ∼10- to 20-fold differences in response sensitivities among the strains. Further, response sensitivities to one stimulus were largely uncoupled from responses to the other stimuli and uncorrelated with the geographical locations from which the wild strains were collected. Using genome-wide association studies, we identified unique regions significantly correlated with different responses to each stimulus. Near-isogenic lines were created to confirm the effects of 2 genomic regions on differential avoidance behavior to the bitter tastant quinine. Combined, we report remarkable natural variation in chemosensory behavioral responses among wild C. elegans strains and describe 2 new quantitative trait loci associated with decreased response sensitivity to quinine.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansGenetic VariationAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait LociQuinineQuinineavoidancebehaviorC. elegans; wild strainGWASnociceptionWormBase

Identifiers

PMID41071928
PMCPMC12693514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.