ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Clinical Potential of Copy Number Aberration as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Lymphoma.
Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphoma is a highly heterogeneous malignancy, demanding accurate and precise diagnosis to guide the selection of the appropriate treatment for optimal outcome. Copy number aberration (CNA) has been suggested to play an important role in the occurrence and development of lymphoma and thus can be explored as biomarker to improve disease management. It is believed that CNAs in variable forms and complexities can be triggered by both exogenous (eg viral infection and ionizing radiation) and endogenous factors (eg genetic predisposition and evolutionary forces). However, conventional cytogenetic methods have limitations to detect all types of CNAs with accuracy and adequate details. The emergence of new technologies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and especially next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made significant progress in the identification and characterization of CNAs or CNA-related genomic aberrations. Accumulating data addressing molecular insights and clinical implications have provided us more theoretical and experimental support for its clinical translation. Currently, while only limited number of CNAs or CNA-related genomic variation, such as deletion/amplification of DNA segments, have been documented in major guidelines or consensus for their clinical potential in lymphoma, more CNAs remain to be further characterized and/or discovered for their clinical relevance. Taking together, with available and upcoming evidence, CNA should play an important role as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker while integrated with the current settings in lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.