Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071875›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Concise network models of memory dynamics reveal explainable patterns in path data.

Rohit Sahasrabuddhe, Renaud Lambiotte, Martin Rosvall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rohit SahasrabuddheMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2779-8310
Renaud LambiotteMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-4595
Martin RosvallIntegrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Umeå University, Umeå 90736, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7181-9940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network methods capture the interplay between structure and dynamics of complex systems across scales by modeling indirect interactions as random walks. However, path data from real-world systems frequently exhibit memory effects that this first-order Markov model fails to capture. Although higher-order Markov models can capture these effects, they grow rapidly in size and require large amounts of data, making them prone to overfitting some parts and underfitting others in systems with uneven coverage. To address this challenge, we construct concise networks from path data by interpolating between first-order and second-order Markov models. We prioritize simplicity and interpretability by creating state nodes that capture prominent second-order effects and by proposing a transparent measure that balances model size and quality. Our concise networks reveal large-scale memory patterns in both synthetic and real-world systems while remaining far simpler than full second-order models.

Identifiers

PMID41071875
PMCPMC12513435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.