ArticleScience advances2025
Hyperactive 20
Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Stimulating proteasomal degradation in human proteinopathies.The FEBS journal · 2026Review
- Multilayer modulation of the proteasome: new strategies for neuroprotection.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
- The emerging role of ubiquitin-proteasome system dysfunction in the pathogenesis of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related proteinopathies, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, are driven by toxic accumulation of misfolded and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) that overwhelm cellular proteostasis. The proteasome clears these proteins, but its failure in disease remains unclear. We engineered a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.