ArticleBiomacromolecules2025
Unimer Exchange as a Tool for Programming Enzymatic Degradation through Micellar Dynamics.
Article in Biomacromolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key challenge in designing enzyme-responsive micellar nanocarriers lies in balancing their stability and enzymatic degradation. While it has been widely assumed that the micelle-unimer exchange governs enzyme accessibility to the hydrophobic blocks, this relationship had not been directly demonstrated. Here, to uncover this long-assumed mechanistic link, we synthesized a set of triblock amphiphiles that convert by an in situ transition to diblock amphiphiles via reductive cleavage of a central disulfide bond. In parallel, hydrophobicity was independently tuned by modifying the aliphatic end-groups. Enzymatic degradation studies and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based exchange assays showed two consistent trends across all systems: increasing hydrophobicity led to slower micelle-unimer exchange and reduced enzymatic degradation rates, while transition to diblock consistently enhanced both. These results provide direct evidence that exchange kinetics govern enzymatic degradation and lay the mechanistic foundation for overcoming the stability-degradability barrier for enzyme-responsive micelles by applying architectural transitions as a molecular programming tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.