Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071841›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Drivers of firm-government engagement for technology ventures.

Lauren Lanahan, Iman Hemmatian, Amol M Joshi, Evan E Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren LanahanLundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0658-5367
Iman HemmatianCollege of Business Administration, Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-0656
Amol M JoshiSchool of Business, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-6749
Evan E JohnsonDepartment of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior scholarship generally examines the returns generated by firm-government engagement. These studies are based on an implicit and understudied assumption - the firm's strategic choice of whether to engage with the government. Here, we unpack the drivers of this choice. To do so, we construct a population-level sample of U.S. high-tech ventures founded between 2015-2017; the full sample exceeds one million firms. We then utilize government records to identify initial firm-government engagement; approximately 24,000 high-tech ventures reveal this preference by firm age three. We examine a range of external and internal factors that may motivate such a choice. The results indicate that firm-government engagement most prominently coincides with firm resource constraints. Features driving such engagement include: (i) underrepresented minority-owned firms; (ii) small firms; (iii) firms with greater early-stage growth potential; and (iv) firms located in less intensive entrepreneurial settings. This study offers managerial, policy, and scholarly contributions by uncovering new insights around firm strategy and government opportunities for high-tech ventures.

Indexed as

EntrepreneurshipGovernmentTechnologyHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41071841
PMCPMC12513645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.