ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Lessons from piloting and scaling a real-time DHIS2 based treatment reporting tool for mass drug administration in Nigeria.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMass drug administration (MDA) is the main intervention strategy for the elimination of several neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). In many endemic settings, monitoring and collation of MDA treatment data are conducted through paper-based forms and Excel-based spreadsheets. These methods are often slow, prone to errors and do not facilitate timely evidence-based decision making during and after MDA campaigns. The Nigerian National NTD programme and Sightsavers, developed a DHIS2 based platform for real-time collection, monitoring, and reporting of MDA treatment data. We piloted and scaled this DHIS2-based platform, monitoring the data quality, access, government ownership and utility of data for programmatic action at all levels.
methodsThree study areas (Jigawa, Enugu and Kwara States), with upcoming MDA campaigns were selected based on geographic spread and model of non-governmental development organisation (NGDO) implementing partner support. Following a pilot in Jigawa State, the DHIS2 platform was scaled-up across all three study areas, alongside the existing Excel-based systems. Programmatic data routinely collected via the two platforms were compared. Instances of data entry and access were monitored via the platform's metadata and a monitored helpline. Data was collected from participants through a self-administered questionnaire, field diaries and focus group discussions/key informant interviews. Quantitative data was analysed using Stata analytical software, while qualitative data was thematically analysed.
resultsThere was increased access and use of data at all levels within the DHIS2 system along with improved perceptions of government ownership of the data. Participants reported the ability to address errors and improve decision-making during campaigns as significant benefits of the platform. Scaling up DHIS2 was feasible, and similar benefits were observed in all the models of NGDO partner assistance.
conclusionThe DHIS2 platform enhanced all components of ownership, as well as demonstrated ability to be replicated in different settings. However, operating models, cultural contexts, and technical capacities across the diverse locations need to be considered when scaling up the platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.