ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Comparative assessment of nutritional status in unoperated children with Congenital Heart Defects: Insights from a tertiary pediatric cardiac center in India.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital Heart Defects (CHD) are structural cardiac malformations ranging from mild to severe forms; greatly impacting childhood mortality and morbidity. Malnutrition as comorbidity in CHD raises treatment complexity, lengthens post-operative recovery period and increases risk of developmental delays. This retrospective study evaluates patterns of malnutrition in 1678 unoperated CHD cases at out-patient department of tertiary pediatric cardiac centre in India compared to 11,894 community based controls. Z-Scores based on WHO reference charts were used for Weight for Age, Height for Age and Weight for Height calculations. Majority of CHD patients belonged to poor socioeconomic background [upper lower = 49.17% and lower middle = 42.99%]. 62.46% cases were underweight, 41.3% stunted and 53.93% wasted compared to controls showing 28.88% underweight (Z = 27.38, p < 0.01), 31.15% stunting (Z = 8.32, p < 0.01) and 14.04% wasting (Z = 39.01, p < 0.01), indicating highly significant undernutrition in cases compared to controls in same age group (0-6 years). Odds ratio analysis showed that CHD cases were 7.19 times more likely to undergo wasting, 4.19 times at higher risk of being underweight and were at 1.63 times increased risk of stunting than controls (p < 0.01). Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) significantly exacerbated undernutrition in terms of wasting and underweight status in CHD (p < 0.01). Lower birth weight was found associated with undernutrition in CHD (p < 0.05). This first large-scale study from India comparing CHD patients with community controls provides comprehensive analysis of nutritional status in unoperated CHD cases indicating significantly higher undernutrition in CHD patients compared to non-CHD controls from same age group. This highlights the need for comprehensive health screening in initial years of life which is crucial for early detection, timely CHD treatment and individualized nutritional management in pediatric cardiac care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.