ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of stretch on conduction in myelinated nerve due to wrist movement: An experimental and analytical study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on related measurements by others, an earlier publication suggested increased nerve conduction velocity (NCV) with stretch in myelinated fibers, an anomaly based on existing knowledge, and hypothesized that widening of narrow zigzag gaps between structures of interdigitated Schwann cell processes at the node affected saltatory conduction to produce this increased NCV. A new nodal resistance Rne between the axonal membrane and extracellular fluid was introduced into the century old cable theory. Later, a direct and careful measurement of ulnar NCV across a 10 cm segment around the elbow by another publication appeared to support the suggestion of increased NCV with stretch. However, in order to eliminate the possibility of slacks of ulnar nerve in the upper arm affecting the measurements, the present work was taken up on a shorter 5 cm segment which again supported the suggestion, increasing confidence in the Rne hypothesis. Furthermore, wrist flexion or extension was also observed to affect the ulnar NCV at the elbow to some extent, revealing a new phenomenon. While attempting to formulate an analytical treatment of Rne, the earlier work found it very challenging as the physical structure was extremely complex. Proposing an alternative physical model to simulate the variation in Rne suggested earlier, the current study presents an analytical treatment that relates Rne and a corresponding effective resistivity value to increases in stretch, and relates these quantitatively to stretch values based on the measured values of NCV. This then provided the basis of a quantitative analysis which could be useful for future research. While appreciating that other microstructures in the node at or near the axonal membrane may also contribute to the observed anomaly, but lack of direct experimental evidence related to nerve stretch tends to weigh more on the Rne hypothesis in explaining the anomaly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.