ArticlePLOS digital health2025
What influences engagement with a bipolar disorder self-management app? A qualitative investigation of use of the PolarUs app.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Usage Time: Rethinking Therapeutic Dose and Effect in Digital Therapeutics.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Alignment of Lived Experience Questions with the Medical Literature in Bipolar Disorder: A Topic Modelling Approach: Adéquation entre les questions relatives à l'expérience vécue et la littérature médicale concernant le trouble bipolaire : Une approche de modélisation de sujets.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2026Article
- Cultural Adaptation of a Digital Mobile App for Bipolar Disorder (PolarUs): Protocol for a Qualitative Co-Design Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventions delivered via smartphone apps may support individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) to learn about and implement evidence-based self-management strategies in the context of their daily lives. However, app usage rates are often suboptimal. The subjective experience of users may provide insights into factors influencing engagement (and disengagement) with an mHealth intervention. The present study describes a qualitative investigation of the experiences of people with BD who participated in the evaluation of a novel app-based intervention for BD self-management, the PolarUs app. Twenty-five individuals with BD were provided with access to an app-based self-management intervention over a three-month study period, and were later interviewed about personal experiences of engagement with the intervention, including attempts to enact self-management strategies. Thematic analysis was used to identify important aspects of the experience of engaging with a self-management app. Three themes describing drivers of engagement with the PolarUs app and associated features were generated: 1) Motivations, 2) Salience, and 3) Perceived effort. Drivers of engagement were shaped by contextual influences, summarised in four themes: 1) The smartphone ecosystem, 2) Daily life, 3) Mood symptoms, and 4) Involvement in a research study. The findings of this research generate insights into how individuals with BD engage with app-based interventions. Lived experience perspectives can inform the design of engaging app-based interventions for BD. Further, these findings emphasise the importance of considering the context in which people use self-management apps for BD for both research studies and implementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.