ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Bridging research and practice using digital twin modeling to mitigate methane emissions across dairy production stages.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined dietary determinants of enteric methane (CH4) emissions in high-yielding Holstein Friesian dairy cows across different physiological stages. Emissions were estimated using the IPCC Tier 2 methodology during peak lactation, the full lactation cycle, and the dry period in two commercial groups with distinct productivity. Group A (38-40 kg milk/day) showed higher peak dry matter intake and fiber content than Group B (32-35 kg milk/day), which had greater ether extract (EE) levels. Peak-lactation CH4 emissions were significantly higher in Group A (P < 0.05), while dry-period values did not differ (P > 0.05). Dietary EE was inversely associated with CH4 output, suggesting a potential mitigation pathway. Phase-specific regression models (adjusted R2 = 0.88-0.93) confirmed diet composition and physiological stage as major drivers of emissions. Digital twin simulations based on these models offer a non-invasive, reproducible tool for predicting emission scenarios, which is particularly valuable in farms where direct measurements are impractical. These findings highlight the feasibility of integrating diet optimization and predictive modeling into herd management strategies, enabling substantial reductions in CH4 emissions while sustaining milk yield and overall productivity in intensive dairy systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.