Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071628›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2025

Three contextual cues and their influence on naming in children.

Nadine Hempkin, Maithri Sivaraman, Dermot Barnes-Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Three contextual cues and their influence on naming in children.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadine HempkinMohammed Bin Rashid Center for Special Education, Operated by the New England Center for Children, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5624-5851
Maithri SivaramanTeachers College, Columbia University, USA.
Dermot Barnes-HolmesSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children often learn the names of objects incidentally-that is without direct instruction or programmed reinforcement-simply by observing others label novel objects. A number of contextual cues have been deemed important in the development of naming such as orientation toward stimuli, pointing, linguistic prompts (e.g., "This is…"), and contiguous presentations of stimuli and sounds. Despite their significance, there has been almost no systematic investigation of these cues in behavior analysis. The current study preliminarily examines how contextual cues-such as an experimenter's eye gaze, pointing, and use of paralinguistic cues-affect naming responses. In Experiment 1, three typically developing children were administered naming tests with and without these cues using a reversal design. All participants showed improved performance with cues relative to without cues. Experiment 2 extended this by testing three autistic children with all cues, a partial set of cues, or no cues, using a reversal design. Results replicated Experiment 1, also demonstrating that partial cues were effective in facilitating naming. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiment 1 with three additional autistic participants during which test trials remained consistent across conditions in a reversal design. Further research on the contextual cues presented during naming experiences is warranted.

Indexed as

CuesAutistic DisorderChildFemaleHumansMaleNamesautismchildrencontextual cuesincidental naming

Identifiers

PMID41071628
PMCPMC12513545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.