Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071566›Full record

ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2025

Design, construction, and evaluation of the BeneFit socket: An adjustable temporary socket for a transradial prosthesis.

Benedikt Baumgartner, Ivan Vujaklija, Oskar C Aszmann, Anna Boesendorfer, Eugenijus Kaniusas, Agnes Sturma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benedikt BaumgartnerClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0994-4257
Ivan VujaklijaDepartment Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7394-9474
Oskar C AszmannClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-726
Anna BoesendorferClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8143-2793
Eugenijus KaniusasInstitute of Biomedical Electronics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1228-3859
Agnes SturmaClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-1394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUpper limb prosthetics aim to restore function and aesthetics of a lost arm and/or hand, which affects a growing population. A "Golden Period," the first month after the amputation, has been identified as the optimal time when a prosthesis should be fitted to amputees to maximize their chances for a fast and successful return to their daily life. This time window is often surpassed because of delays in approvals by health insurance companies and time requirements for producing personally customized and costly sockets. This study aims to develop an adaptable and versatile temporary transradial socket design capable of multidimensional adjustments and easy user fitting to better capitalize on the "Golden Period" and allow for early prosthetic training. In addition, the socket should be useable within research in need for flexible prosthesis as well as a hybrid prosthesis within the context of bionic reconstruction. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The socket was designed, 3D printed, and assembled as a wearable prototype, hosting all relevant myoelectric hand components. The estimated satisfaction with the socket was evaluated in a monocentric, explorative study with both, prosthetic users and experts in the field. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The proposed design is able to change its diameter and length. Moreover, according to the conducted survey, it is perceived as satisfactory with respect to both user needs and expectations of the experts. "Weight," "ease in donning and doffing," and "breathability" were rated particularly well, whereas an improved, more versatile, and smaller design is needed for broad clinical use.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsProsthesis DesignProsthesis FittingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPrinting, Three-Dimensionalamputationearly prosthetic fittingprosthesis adjustmentprosthesis designupper extremityupper limb prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID41071566
PMCPMC12509435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.