Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Web-Based Guided Self-Help vs Treatment as Usual for Binge-Eating Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations Between Baseline Severity and Treatment Effects in Digital Interventions for Eating Disorders: A Meta-Regression.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Pooled it
- Design, Implement, Sustain: Advancing Program-Led Interventions for Binge Eating, a Narrative Review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Review
- Implementing Supported Digital Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Binge Eating Disorder in Routine Care: Mixed Methods Service Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Preliminary findings suggest that web-based guided self-help, which is easily scalable and shorter in duration, may be an effective treatment for binge-eating disorder, yet it is rarely offered or only used as a first-line treatment in a stepped-care approach. Despite its benefits and cost savings, few studies have directly compared it with treatment as usual. Evaluating a psychological treatment that requires minimal therapist involvement is crucial for reducing costs, improving accessibility, and promoting patient agency in recovery. Objective: To assess whether web-based guided self-help is noninferior to treatment as usual for binge-eating disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-arm noninferiority randomized clinical trial of adults with binge-eating disorder was conducted between November 2021 and October 2024 at a specialized center for eating disorders in the Netherlands. Interventions: Participants received either 12 weeks of web-based guided self-help or 20 weeks of comprehensive treatment as usual. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the comparative difference in the number of objective binge-eating episodes at the end of treatment and at 20 weeks after treatment. Secondary measures included full remission, dropout, therapeutic alliance, body dissatisfaction, clinical impairment, and body mass index. To examine differences in outcomes between groups, linear mixed model analyses with restricted maximum likelihood estimation, multilevel negative binomial regression, and multilevel binary logistic regression were used. Results: Among a referred sample of 207 adults with binge-eating disorder, 187 participants (160 females [85.6%]; mean [SD] age, 38.1 [0.9] years) were randomized to web-based guided self-help (n = 93) or treatment as usual (n = 94). With a margin of 1 additional binge-eating episode, a contrast estimate noninferiority was found between groups at the end of treatment (-0.82 [95% CI, -1.86 to 0.21]; P = .12) and at 20 weeks after treatment (-0.58 [95% CI, -1.41 to 0.26]; P = .17). At both assessments, a difference in objective binge-eating episodes was found in favor of web-based guided self-help (end of treatment: 3.24 [95% CI, 2.42-4.33] vs 4.06 [3.17-5.20]; 20 weeks after treatment: 1.27 [95% CI, 0.81-1.97] vs 1.84 [95% CI, 1.24-2.73]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, web-based guided self-help was noninferior to treatment as usual in reducing binge eating, despite its shorter duration and lower level of therapist involvement. These results suggest more evidence for the effectiveness of web-based mental health care, which is an important finding amid global challenges with mental health staff shortages, long waiting lists, and high treatment costs. Trial Registration: Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects Identifier: NL76368.100.21.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.