Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071500›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2026

Moving from In-Person to Digital Delivery Models of HIV Peer Support Services in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.

Brent Clifton, Dean Murphy, Jeanne Ellard, Garrett Prestage, Nathanael Wells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brent CliftonNAPWHA (National Association of People with HIV Australia), Newtown, Australia.
Dean MurphyAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health, and Society, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeanne EllardAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health, and Society, Melbourne, Australia.
Garrett PrestageKirby Institute, UNSW, Kensington, Australia.
Nathanael WellsKirby Institute, UNSW, Kensington, Australia. nwells@kirby.unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2827-8480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 saw a rapid shift in how community-based peer support programs were delivered. HIV peer support workers were required to work from home and community-based HIV and LGBTQ + organisations moved their support programs to digital platforms. Between May and September 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who worked (n = 17) or volunteered (n = 4) for community-based HIV and/or LGBTQ + health organisations. Interviews explored the impact of moving to digital service delivery on how peer support programs were delivered and the impact on peer support workers. We identified three overarching themes. Firstly, we highlight challenges with rapidly shifting to online service delivery, particularly as this shift limited opportunities for informal interactions between participants. Informal interactions were considered an important aspect of peer support programs. Secondly, the move to digital service delivery diminished opportunities for informal support between peer workers and their colleagues, just as they were also adjusting to a new and unfamiliar working environment. Thirdly, the removing of physical distance as a specific barrier to care opened new opportunities for engaging potential clients who may have previously had difficulties in accessing HIV support services. We argue that careful consideration is needed to address barriers specific to digital service delivery, including lack of access to appropriate technology and telecommunication infrastructure, as well as concerns about participants' privacy.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV InfectionsPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Sexual and Gender MinoritiesTelemedicineCOVID-19Digital healthHIVHIV peer supportPeer support

Identifiers

PMID41071500
PMCPMC12929311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.