Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071452›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2025

Can Large Language Models Address Problem Gambling? Expert Insights from Gambling Treatment Professionals.

Kasra Ghaharian, Marta Soligo, Richard Young, Lukasz Golab, Shane W Kraus, Samantha Wells

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kasra GhaharianInternational Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA. kasra.ghaharian@unlv.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-0278
Marta SoligoWilliam F. Harrah College of Hospitality, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4074-4202
Richard YoungInternational Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-7552
Lukasz GolabDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0632-7496
Shane W KrausDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-9480
Samantha WellsDepartment of Teaching and Learning, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6906-1551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed information retrieval for humans. People are increasingly turning to general-purpose LLM-based chatbots to find answers to questions across numerous domains, including advice on sensitive topics such as mental health and addiction. In this study, we present the first inquiry into how LLMs respond to prompts related to problem gambling, specifically exploring how experienced gambling treatment professionals interpret and reflect on these responses. We used the Problem Gambling Severity Index to develop nine prompts related to different aspects of gambling behavior. These prompts were submitted to two LLMs, GPT-4o (via ChatGPT) and Llama 3.1 405b (via Meta AI), and their responses were evaluated via an online survey distributed to human experts (experienced gambling treatment professionals). Twenty-three experts participated, representing over 17,000 hours of problem gambling treatment experience. They provided their own responses to the prompts and selected their preferred (blinded) LLM response, along with contextual feedback, which was used for qualitative analysis. Llama was slightly preferred over GPT, receiving more votes for 7 out of the 9 prompts. Thematic analysis revealed that experts identified strengths and weaknesses in LLM responses, highlighting issues such as encouragement of continued gambling, overly verbose messaging, and language that could be easily misconstrued. These findings offer a novel perspective by capturing how experienced gambling treatment professionals perceive LLM responses in the context of problem gambling, providing insights to inform future efforts to align these tools with appropriate guardrails and safety standards for use in gambling harm interventions.

Indexed as

AI alignmentArtificial intelligenceGamblingLarge language modelsProblem gambling

Identifiers

PMID41071452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.