Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071443›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Defining critical symptom parameters for an ePRO-based management pathway during systemic treatment for advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer: a longitudinal study.

Xin Shelley Wang, Mariela Blum Murphy, Shu-En Shen, Elizabeth Letona, Laila Noor, Charles S Cleeland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin Shelley WangDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. xswang@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2348-8005
Mariela Blum MurphyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-3590
Shu-En ShenDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7578-5397
Elizabeth LetonaDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Laila NoorDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-7543
Charles S CleelandDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-6527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstablishing a care pathway based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is necessary to effectively assess and manage outpatients undergoing active treatment. This study investigated symptom burden in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer and the characteristics needed for implementing an ePRO system to monitor these patients.

methodsPatients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic UGI cancer rated symptom severity and functional impairment by completing the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) repeatedly for 12 months. Group-based trajectory analysis classified patients into a high-severity symptom group if their symptoms were consistently rated higher than other patients' symptoms over time. A composite score of the most-severe symptoms was calculated and evaluated.

resultsOf 111 enrollees, 92 patients (esophageal, 35%; gastroesophageal junction, 25%; gastric, 40%) provided PRO data at baseline plus at least the first 2 weeks of treatment. More than 55% of patients were in the high-severity group for fatigue, lack of appetite, numbness/tingling, and drowsiness, and more than 33% were in the high-severity symptom for inability to eat, nausea, pain, and disturbed sleep. A composite score of these 8 symptoms (45% in the high-severity symptom group; mean 4.5, median 4.4) was associated with poorer quality of life.

conclusionIn this real-world longitudinal study, 45% of patients with advanced UGI reported 8 disease- or treatment-specific symptoms that were persistently more severe over time. This provides a rationale for implementing ePRO-based routine assessment and management of this patient cohort during systemic therapy, especially during the first 12 weeks of treatment.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexAdvanced upper gastrointestinal cancerComposite scoreFunctional deteriorationMDASI-GIPatient-reported outcomes (PROs)Symptom burden

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.