ReviewJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2025
Artificial Intelligence in and Beyond Healthcare Psychology.
Review in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been developed through interdisciplinary efforts since the 1940s, but generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) gained unprecedented attention with the launch of ChatGPT by OpenAI in late 2022. As these AI tools have become globally ubiquitous, significant implications arise for clinicians within and beyond healthcare settings. The simulation or emulation of human intelligence through coded heuristics now permeates clinical domains, creating new opportunities alongside ethical challenges that require careful exploration. For healthcare psychologists, regardless of specialty, it has become a priority to remain at the forefront of these technological advances. This includes developing literacy not only in psychological emulation software but also in the rapidly growing hardware that supports AI. Well-informed clinicians must act as responsible stewards of this advancing technology and its application in healthcare. These responsibilities must be approached through the lens of both existing and evolving ethical standards in human psychology. Although these tasks may seem daunting, the urgency, opportunities, and necessity for healthcare psychologists to engage thoughtfully with AI are clear. This engagement ensures that patient care benefits from innovation while upholding ethical principles. Said opportunities and the urgency for healthcare psychologists are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41071404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.