Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071389›Full record

ArticlePlanta2025

Radiation quality matters: morphological and biochemical responses of Brassica rapa microgreens to X-rays, C-ions, and Fe-ions.

Sara De Francesco, Chiara Amitrano, Ermenegilda Vitale, Giulia Costanzo, Walter Tinganelli, Mariagabriella Pugliese, Cecilia Arrichiello, Paolo Muto, Marco Durante, Stefania De Pascale and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sara De Francesco *Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Chiara Amitrano *Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Ermenegilda VitaleDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Giulia CostanzoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Walter TinganelliBiophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum Für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Planckstraße 1, 64291, Darmstadt, Germany.
Mariagabriella PuglieseDepartment of Physics "E. Pancini", University of Naples Federico II, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Cecilia ArrichielloRadiotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Paolo MutoRadiotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Marco DuranteBiophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum Für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Planckstraße 1, 64291, Darmstadt, Germany.
Stefania De PascaleDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy.
Carmen ArenaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126, Naples, Italy. carmen.arena@unina.it.
Veronica De MiccoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055, Naples, Italy. demicco@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4282-9525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionRadiation type and dose distinctly modulate microgreens development, revealing trait-specific thresholds where X-rays induce hormesis, carbon ions delay differentiation, and iron ions enhance biochemical balance with moderate anatomical disruption. As space exploration progresses and controlled-environment agriculture becomes increasingly relevant under extreme conditions, understanding how ionizing radiation affects plant development is crucial. Ionizing radiation poses a major constraint in space cultivation systems, also playing a role in terrestrial stress scenarios. Despite growing interest in radiation biology, few studies have systematically compared plant responses to different radiation types with distinct linear energy transfer (LET). In this study, seeds of Brassica rapa L. were exposed to increasing doses of X-rays (low-LET), carbon ions, and iron ions (high-LET). Seed germination, morpho-anatomical, and biochemical traits of plants were assessed up to the microgreens stage. Plant responses were both dose- and radiation-specific. Specifically, X-rays triggered a hormetic response at low doses (1 Gy), with a decline in several analyzed traits at higher doses. Carbon ions increased leaf expansion but reduced the content of pigments, proteins, and the structural investment, suggesting a delayed tissue differentiation and low-cost acclimation mechanism under stress. Iron ions promoted a coordinated upregulation of biochemical defenses and moderate anatomical changes. Overall, radiation quality induced distinct acclimation strategies in B. rapa, influencing the balance between growth, structural integrity, and defense mechanisms, highlighting its notable radioresistance. Moreover, identifying trait-specific thresholds and response patterns suggests that different radiation types could be selectively applied to modulate specific functions (e.g., biomass or antioxidants promotion, anatomical adjustments) based on desired outcomes. These findings provide valuable insights into how different ionizing radiation types impact plant responses, addressing a critical gap in space-oriented research and guiding strategies to optimize plant growth in extraterrestrial environments.

Indexed as

Brassica rapaCarbonIronDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGerminationHormesisLinear Energy TransferPlant LeavesSeedsX-RaysCarbonIronExtreme environmentsIonizing radiationLeaf traitsPhytochemical countermeasuresRadiobiologyStress response

Identifiers

PMID41071389
PMCPMC12513970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.