Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071387›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Bowel position does not preclude safe access in prone trans-psoas surgery.

Yi Yuen Wang, Gabriel Pokorny, Bryden Dawes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi Yuen WangSt Vincent's Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Gabriel PokornyInstituto de Patologia da Coluna (IPC), São Paulo, Brazil. ghpokorny@gmail.com.
Bryden DawesSt Vincent's Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are conflicting reports of the safety of surgical approach to the lateral spine during prone transpsoas surgery based on cadaveric and radiological data however a lack of true clinical data assessing safety is available. The objective of the study is to introduce a grading system assessing the safety of the surgical approach corridor in prone transpsoas surgery specifically in relation to bowel position, and the impact of the bowel position on bowel complications after prone transpsoas (PTP) surgery. Retrospective review of prospectively collated data. A 5-point grading system of bowel overlay was established. Consecutive patients undergoing prone transpsoas surgery across eighteen months were reviewed and graded using the 5-point grading system. Exclusions for prone transpsoas surgery was the configuration of the psoas musculature and retroperitoneal vessels. No consideration was given in regard to the bowel position pre-operatively. Analysis of grade in comparison to BMI, side of approach and levels were performed with the primary outcome measure being bowel injury. One hundred and forty patients were included in the study, all of whom underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation at 207 spinal levels. Mean age was 72.0 ± 9.9 with a female (N = 93) preponderance and an average BMI of 28.2 ± 4.9 kg/m

Indexed as

Patient PositioningPsoas MusclesSpinal FusionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedicle ScrewsPostoperative ComplicationsProne PositionRetrospective StudiesLateral lumbar interbody fusionProne trans-psoasRetro-peritonealSpinal fusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.