ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
From cartilage to bone: the utility of ultrasonography in age estimation using forearm bones: a novel scoring system approach.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic age estimation is of critical legal importance. This study aimed to assess the utility of ultrasonography (US) as an alternative, safe, non-invasive technique that could replace other roentgenographic modalities in forensic age estimation. Epiphyseal maturation staging of the upper and lower ends of the radius and ulna using US was conducted for 155 Egyptian juveniles and adolescents, showing a mean age of 15.8 ± 3.7 years. Above the age of 17, all females demonstrated complete epiphyseal closure of the proximal bone ends, and above the age of 18, the distal end of ulna was completely united. All males demonstrated complete epiphyseal union of the proximal ulna above 17 years, the proximal radius above 18 years, and distal ulnas above 20 years. A proposed model. [Formula: see text] using a novel total score assessing epiphyseal maturation of all forearm bones could significantly explain 85.6% of age variations, with very low error, where the predicted age deviates from the real age by approximately 1.0 to 1.2 years. We observed a substantial to near-perfect agreement between the estimated and chronological age (coefficients>0.879). The overall score has the highest accuracy in predicting the ages of 15, 16, 17, and 18 years (p < 0.001). Females showed accelerated epiphyseal maturation compared to males, and the proximal forearm bones approached full maturation before the distal ends. Using the proposed novel score assessing the proximal and distal ends of the ulna and radius through US offers a simple and radiation-free approach that could predict age with precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41071353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.