Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071321›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Health impacts of climate change and role of the health sector in mitigating carbon emissions. German version].

E Rothwell, Jonny Groome

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E RothwellUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Trust, Bristol, Großbritannien.
Jonny GroomePaediatric Anaesthetic Department Office, Level 4, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, E11FR, London, Großbritannien. jonathan.groome@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The climate crisis has been identified as the largest threat to human health; paradoxically, the healthcare sector is responsible for 5% of the global greenhouse gas emissions that are driving this crisis. These emissions are largely due to carbon-intensive facilities, energy use, complex global supply chains, transportation and pharmaceuticals. In its role of safeguarding the health of both current and future populations, the healthcare sector must take actions to minimise its environmental impact. Strategies for emission reduction include sustainable infrastructure, clinical practice innovations, and procurement and supply chain reform. This article aims to examine current evidence on the health impacts of climate change and explore strategies through which the healthcare sector can reduce its environmental impact while continuing to deliver high-quality care.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeGreenhouse GasesHealth Care SectorGermanyGreenhouse EffectHumansGreenhouse GasesClimate crisisClimate mitigationPlanetary healthSustainabilitySustainable hospitals

Identifiers

PMID41071321
PMCPMC12575500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.