ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Unmasking the phospholipid-induced "hook effect" and its implications - increasing phospholipid can also lead to a longer clotting time in coagulation assays.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is generally accepted that higher phospholipid concentrations generate shorter clotting times. Phospholipid-dependent lupus anticoagulants (LA) assays such as dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and silica clotting time (SCT) have therefore been developed. However, cases have been observed where LA confirming tests (concentrated phospholipid) generates longer clotting times than screening tests (diluted phospholipid). This study investigates the underlying cause of this paradox and assess its implications. With different phospholipid concentrations, Russell's viper venom and/or silica-induced clotting times were assayed in normal pooled plasmas (NPPs), factor deficient plasmas, cirrhotic patients' plasmas (CPPs), LA positive plasmas (LPPs). Additionally, routine LA assays were performed in LPPs with or without factor deficiency. In NPPs and factor deficient plasmas, higher phospholipid concentrations resulted in shorter clotting times, however, this effect was more evident with low-middle phospholipid than with higher phospholipid (a U shape curve). In CPPs, clotting time was increasing along with increasing phospholipid from the beginning (right part of a U shape curve). In LPPs, clotting time was shortening along with increasing phospholipid at the beginning, but changeless thereafter (left part of a U shape curve). Compared to LPPs without factor deficiency, LPPs with factor deficiency demonstrated a smaller correction of screening by confirming (dRVVT, 25.9% versus 15.1%, SCT, 28.6% versus 4.1%), leading to a possibility of LA misdiagnosis. Increasing phospholipid could induce "hook effect" in coagulation assays, therefore, phospholipid-dependent clot-based coagulation assays such as LA assays need careful interpretation, especially among patients suffering coagulation factor deficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.