ArticleThe Veterinary record2025
Randomised controlled field trial to assess the safety and efficacy of a killed autologous vaccine against Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies dysgalactiae in a sheep flock.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionJoint-ill in neonatal lambs, primarily caused by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies dysgalactiae (SDSD), results in increased mortality and morbidity. An effective vaccine is needed to prevent the disease.
methodsA blinded randomised controlled trial was carried out using an autologous SDSD vaccine in a commercial sheep flock in the UK. Two doses of vaccine were administered to 481 pregnant ewes, with 509 ewes left unvaccinated. The SDSD antibody titres of the ewes and their lambs were then measured. Any adverse effects or cases of joint-ill were also reported.
resultsTen cases of joint-ill occurred, with five of these lambs born to vaccinated ewes and five to unvaccinated ewes. Serum from 85 vaccinated ewes and 88 control ewes was analysed using an SDSD antibody ELISA, with higher titres found in vaccinated ewes. Higher SDSD titres were observed in lambs from vaccinated ewes (n = 87) than in lambs from unvaccinated ewes (n = 91). No differences were detected between colostrum samples from vaccinated and unvaccinated ewes. No vaccination-associated adverse effects were detected. LIMITATIONS: Randomisation was effective; however, ELISA data were limited to mainly crossbred ewes, reducing the power of the breed comparisons.
conclusionsThe vaccine had no effect in reducing the number of lambs with joint-ill born to vaccinated ewes compared with unvaccinated ewes. However, vaccinating ewes did have a positive effect on their serum SDSD antibody concentrations and those of their lambs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.