ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2026
CN-macroEMG does not provide additional support for diagnosing inflammatory myopathies.
Article in European journal of translational myology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We read with interest the article by ElZamarany et al. on a case-control study of the use of concentric needle macroelectromyography (CN-macroEMG) in 26 patients with Inflammatory Myopathies (IM) and 20 healthy control subjects.1 The study concludes that CN macroEMG provides optimal results in the diagnosis of IM and can be helpful in the follow-up of IM patients.1 The study is impressive, but some points should be discussed. The first point is that the objectives of the study were not specified.1 We should know whether the study was conducted to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the method for diagnosing IM, or simply to document that CN-macroEMG may be abnormal in patients with IM. If the aim was to calculate sensitivity/specificity, we should know which gold standard for the diagnosis of IM was used to compare it with the CN-macroEMG findings. [...].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.