ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Archetypal Analysis Reveals Consistent Visual Field Patterns for Stimulus Size III and Size Modulation Perimetry in Glaucoma.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Optic nerve disorders produce identifiable visual field (VF) patterns. Size modulation perimetry (SMP) unlike standard automated perimetry (SAP) shows little degradation of retest variability with increasing VF damage. We hypothesize that VF testing with stimulus size III (size III) and SMP would reveal analogous patterns, supporting interchangeability in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed 274 same-day pairs of VFs from 83 eyes of patients with glaucoma. Participants underwent testing every 6 months using size III and SMP VFs. We converted raw sensitivity data to total deviation (TD) scores relative to normative datasets, censoring size III sensitivities below 20 decibels (dB). Archetypal analysis (AA) was applied separately to each modality to identify characteristic VF patterns, or archetypes (ATs). We evaluated both absolute VF patterns and longitudinal VF changes by subtracting baseline measurements. Cosine similarity measured the overlap between ATs in size III and SMP. Results: Absolute size III and SMP VFs exhibited overlapping patterns, with 95% of ATs demonstrating a cosine similarity of ≥0.50. Change ATs showed lower similarity scores (30% with cosine similarity ≥0.50). However, some ATs still revealed similar underlying defects. Conclusions: AA consistently extracted comparable VF defect patterns from size III and SMP in glaucoma. Absolute size III patterns closely aligned with SMP, whereas patterns of change showed partial agreement. Translational Relevance: These findings suggest that SAP and SMP capture similar patterns of VF loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.