Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071029›Full record

ReviewInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

IMI-Myopia Genetics Report.

Mats Voogelaar, Milly S Tedja, Jeremy A Guggenheim, Seang-Mei Saw, Martha Tjon-Fo-Sang, David A Mackey, Christopher J Hammond, Caroline C W Klaver, Virginie J M Verhoeven

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Shared Genetic Basis Underlying Myopia-Exotropia Comorbidity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mats VoogelaarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Milly S TedjaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeremy A GuggenheimSchool of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Seang-Mei SawOphthalmology & Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Program (Eye ACP), Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Martha Tjon-Fo-SangThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
David A MackeyLions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Christopher J HammondSection of Academic Ophthalmology, School of Life Course Sciences, FoLSM, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Caroline C W KlaverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Virginie J M VerhoevenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The genetic landscape of myopia has advanced considerably since the previous International Myopia Institute genetics reports. This white paper provides an updated overview of current findings on myopia genetics and identifies priorities for future research. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review covering genome-wide association studies (GWASs), rare variant analyses, functional genomics, and multiomics approaches. Specific focus areas included common and high myopia, monogenic syndromes, and gene-environment interactions. Results: Over 1000 common variants have now been associated with refractive error and myopia, implicating pathways in retinal signaling, extracellular matrix remodeling, and neurodevelopment. Whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing studies have uncovered rare variants in new candidate genes for high and syndromic myopia. Polygenic risk scores show improved predictive power when combined with environmental and demographic factors. A growing number of studies have explored gene-environment interactions, genetic pleiotropy, and causal inference using Mendelian randomization. These analyses support a role for educational attainment, screen time, physical activity, and metabolic or inflammatory biomarkers in refractive error development. Conclusions: While a substantial portion of myopia heritability remains unexplained, future efforts should prioritize integrative approaches combining genetic, functional, and multiomics data across diverse populations. This will be essential for advancing personalized risk prediction, our understanding of gene-environment interplay, and identifying individuals most likely to benefit from targeted prevention or treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMyopiaGene-Environment InteractionGenome-Wide Association StudyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41071029
PMCPMC12524831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.