Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41071019›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Attention-induced perceptual traveling waves in binocular rivalry.

João V X Cardoso, Hsin-Hung Li, David J Heeger, Laura Dugué

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

João V X CardosoUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Hsin-Hung LiDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
David J HeegerDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Laura DuguéUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical traveling waves-smooth changes of phase over time across the cortical surface-have been proposed to modulate perception periodically as they travel through retinotopic cortex, yet little is known about the underlying computational principles. Here, we make use of binocular rivalry, a perceptual phenomenon in which perceptual (illusory) waves are perceived when a shift in dominance occurs between two rival images. First, we assessed these perceptual waves using psychophysics. Participants viewed a stimulus restricted to an annulus around fixation, with orthogonal orientations presented to each eye. The stimulus presented to one eye was of greater contrast, thus generating perceptual dominance. When a patch of greater contrast was flashed briefly at one position in the other eye, it created a change in dominance that started at that location of the flash and expanded progressively, like a wave, as the previously suppressed stimulus became dominant. We found that the duration of the perceptual propagation increased with both distance traveled and eccentricity of the annulus. Diverting attention away from the annulus reduced drastically the occurrence and the speed of the wave. Second, we developed a computational model of traveling waves in which competition between the neural representations of the two stimuli is driven by both attentional modulation and mutual inhibition. We found that the model captured the key features of wave propagation dynamics. Together, these findings provide new insights into the functional relevance of cortical traveling waves and offer a framework for further experimental investigation into their role in perception.

Indexed as

AttentionDominance, OcularVision, BinocularVision DisparityVisual CortexAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychophysicsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41071019
PMCPMC12524872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.